Passing the baton

Posted by: on January 25, 2012 | No Comments

Passing the baton

It is impor­tant to remem­ber that with­out clear lead­er­ship tran­si­tion plans in place, things can go awry.

By DR TAN LAI YONG

Lead­er­ship is tough any­way; at non-​profit organ­i­sa­tions, it is uniquely difficult.

Some­times we see non-​profits fade away. Oth­ers explode into the media with sto­ries of unwel­come lead­er­ship squab­bles. One way to ensure long-​term sus­tain­abil­ity and a healthy organ­i­sa­tion is to face the tough, but needed, task of groom­ing new lead­ers. Vol­un­teers are hard to come by and it can be over­whelm­ing for present lead­ers to even think about the idea of groom­ing lead­ers from amongst the vol­un­teers. How­ever, we should always be plan­ning to han­dover leadership.

Lead­er­ship tran­si­tion and han­dover is not an event but a process. We need to iden­tify good peo­ple and in our “rou­tine” daily work, empower them to take over areas of respon­si­bil­ity. We also need to be mind­ful that we do not micro-​manage. The 26th US Pres­i­dent Theodore Roo­sevelt once said, “The best exec­u­tive is the one who has sense enough to pick good men to do what he wants done, and self-​restraint to keep from med­dling with them while they do it.”

In the pop­u­lar TV series, “Crime Scene Inves­ti­ga­tion” (CSI), we see that the police always use yel­low tape to cor­don off the crime scene. That allows the scene to be untouched and experts to work undis­turbed. In lead­er­ship, we should draw up some para­me­ters that will help han­dover and allow incom­ing lead­ers to flour­ish. I found it help­ful to think of three points in non-​profit lead­er­ship changes:

C – Cut the budget

S – Set­tle the quarrels

I – Intro­duce the leader

Cut the budget

It is tough to get new lead­ers for non-​profit organ­i­sa­tions. But it is next to impos­si­ble to find a new leader who is will­ing to inherit a project or a depart­ment with an inflated bud­get deficit. Even if he or she is will­ing, it is a lousy start to a lead­er­ship expe­ri­ence to come into a team or project and have the ugly task of slash­ing bud­gets; this invari­ably upsets peo­ple. In order to pre­pare for lead­er­ship han­dover espe­cially in non-​profits, VWOs and other vol­un­teer groups, the out­go­ing lead­er­ship must work on giv­ing the new leader a trim budget.

Set­tle the quarrels

We are humans and face people-​to-​people fric­tion. The ten­sions and fric­tion may be height­ened in non-​profits as we work with peo­ple with big ideals and great pas­sion. The out­go­ing lead­er­ship must set­tle the quar­rels and rifts within the core com­mu­nity. We have to bite the bul­let and lis­ten to our peo­ple, heal the wounds, and apol­o­gise where apolo­gies are due. This allows the new leader to come in with a clean slate and not inherit messy inter­per­sonal relationships.

The 18th cen­tury Eng­lish author and inven­tor, Thomas Paine, who was involved in the French and Amer­i­can Rev­o­lu­tion wrote, “If there must be trou­ble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.” What is true for par­ent­ing is also true for lead­er­ship – exist­ing lead­er­ship should set­tle the trou­ble of the day – the office quar­rels and inter­per­sonal con­flicts – before think­ing about hand­ing over to new lead­ers. (I find it instruc­tive that as an inven­tor, Paine designed bridges and was given the patent for the sin­gle span iron bridge.)

Intro­duce the (new) leader

Intro­duc­ing the new lead­ers sounds like an obvi­ous task, but remem­ber, it takes time and effort to bring a new leader into the inner cir­cle. Lead­er­ship tran­si­tion is not just about hand­ing over accounts and bud­gets. The out­go­ing leader(s) should bring the new leader(s) to meet peo­ple. This is very impor­tant in our Asian soci­ety. For tran­si­tion to take place, we must know our incom­ing peo­ple. We go beyond the per­func­tory task of hand­ing out name cards to a process of get­ting to know our peo­ple stake­hold­ers – such as the board of gov­er­nors, grass­root vol­un­teers and admin­is­tra­tive staff – so as to share his or her heart­beat with them. We should set the stage for a meet­ing of hearts and minds as this is the lifeblood of volunteerism. 

As men­tioned, lead­er­ship han­dover is not an event but a process. Messy han­dovers are often laced with money and inter­per­sonal issues. The best han­dover occurs when we pass on a trim plat­form to a new leader who is well-​trained, con­fi­dent, empow­ered and knowl­edge­able of the key stake­hold­ers. The new leader can then carry out the vision and mis­sion of the organ­i­sa­tion and be free to take off with new ener­gies. After all, the point of hand­ing over lead­er­ship is so that they carry out the task with fresh vigour and not come in to just clean up the mess that we leave behind. Good lead­er­ship han­dover there­fore requires good lead­er­ship dur­ing the process.

From 1996 to 2010, Dr Tan Lai Yong lived in Yun­nan, China, as part of a com­mu­nity devel­op­ment team work­ing with poverty affected villages. Dr Tan estab­lished a vil­lage “bare­foot” doc­tors train­ing pro­gramme and helped with some vil­lage toi­let projects. He also arranged for vol­un­teer teams from Sin­ga­porean schools and hos­pi­tals to visit Yun­nan. In Novem­ber 2010, Tan returned to Sin­ga­pore. He is now a full-​time stu­dent at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Pub­lic Pol­icy (NUS). His work in Yun­nan has been taken over by a group of younger and more dynamic doc­tors – from Sin­ga­pore and China. 

email

It is important to remember that without clear leadership transition plans in place, things can go awry.

 

By DR TAN LAI YONG

 

Leadership is tough anyway; at non-profit organisations, it is uniquely difficult.

Sometimes we see non-profits fade away. Others explode into the media with stories of unwelcome leadership squabbles. One way to ensure long-term sustainability and a healthy organisation is to face the tough, but needed, task of grooming new leaders. Volunteers are hard to come by and it can be overwhelming for present leaders to even think about the idea of grooming leaders from amongst the volunteers. However, we should always be planning to handover leadership.

Leadership transition and handover is not an event but a process. We need to identify good people and in our “routine” daily work, empower them to take over areas of responsibility. We also need to be mindful that we do not micro-manage. The 26th US President Theodore Roosevelt once said, “The best executive is the one who has sense enough to pick good men to do what he wants done, and self-restraint to keep from meddling with them while they do it.”

In the popular TV series, “Crime Scene Investigation” (CSI), we see that the police always use yellow tape to cordon off the crime scene. That allows the scene to be untouched and experts to work undisturbed. In leadership, we should draw up some parameters that will help handover and allow incoming leaders to flourish. I found it helpful to think of three points in non-profit leadership changes:

C – Cut the budget

S – Settle the quarrels

I – Introduce the leader

 

Cut the budget

It is tough to get new leaders for non-profit organisations. But it is next to impossible to find a new leader who is willing to inherit a project or a department with an inflated budget deficit. Even if he or she is willing, it is a lousy start to a leadership experience to come into a team or project and have the ugly task of slashing budgets; this invariably upsets people. In order to prepare for leadership handover especially in non-profits, VWOs and other volunteer groups, the outgoing leadership must work on giving the new leader a trim budget.

 

Settle the quarrels

We are humans and face people-to-people friction. The tensions and friction may be heightened in non-profits as we work with people with big ideals and great passion. The outgoing leadership must settle the quarrels and rifts within the core community. We have to bite the bullet and listen to our people, heal the wounds, and apologise where apologies are due. This allows the new leader to come in with a clean slate and not inherit messy interpersonal relationships.

The 18th century English author and inventor, Thomas Paine, who was involved in the French and American Revolution wrote, “If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.” What is true for parenting is also true for leadership – existing leadership should settle the trouble of the day – the office quarrels and interpersonal conflicts – before thinking about handing over to new leaders. (I find it instructive that as an inventor, Paine designed bridges and was given the patent for the single span iron bridge.)

 

Introduce the (new) leader

Introducing the new leaders sounds like an obvious task, but remember, it takes time and effort to bring a new leader into the inner circle. Leadership transition is not just about handing over accounts and budgets. The outgoing leader(s) should bring the new leader(s) to meet people. This is very important in our Asian society. For transition to take place, we must know our incoming people. We go beyond the perfunctory task of handing out name cards to a process of getting to know our people stakeholders – such as the board of governors, grassroot volunteers and administrative staff – so as to share his or her heartbeat with them. We should set the stage for a meeting of hearts and minds as this is the lifeblood of volunteerism. 

As mentioned, leadership handover is not an event but a process. Messy handovers are often laced with money and interpersonal issues. The best handover occurs when we pass on a trim platform to a new leader who is well-trained, confident, empowered and knowledgeable of the key stakeholders. The new leader can then carry out the vision and mission of the organisation and be free to take off with new energies. After all, the point of handing over leadership is so that they carry out the task with fresh vigour and not come in to just clean up the mess that we leave behind. Good leadership handover therefore requires good leadership during the process.

 

From 1996 to 2010, Dr Tan Lai Yong lived in Yunnan, China, as part of a community development team working with poverty affected villages. Dr Tan established a village “barefoot” doctors training programme and helped with some village toilet projects. He also arranged for volunteer teams from Singaporean schools and hospitals to visit Yunnan. In November 2010, Tan returned to Singapore. He is now a full-time student at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (NUS). His work in Yunnan has been taken over by a group of younger and more dynamic doctors – from Singapore and China. 

Leave a Reply

show
 
close
rss facebook youtube email